Reviews

What our learners are saying

Reviews from people preparing for the Claude Certified exams on Cred Farmer. Nobody was paid for them, the critical ones are here too, and where a review led to a change, our reply says what we fixed.

How these reviews got here

  • Every review here is up because its author chose that: they ticked a box to post it, or, for the earlier feedback described next, agreed by email when we asked.
  • On 28 September 2026 we published feedback that had been sent to us through a form promising it would never be published. That broke the promise, so on 16 October we withdrew all of it. We then asked each author by email, and on 30 October we put back the reviews whose authors agreed, shown as “Verified learner” rather than by name.
  • We publish them as written, typos included. Where we removed personal details, such as an email address, the review says so.
  • Authors can hide their name or remove their review at any time from Settings.
  • A reply marked Fixed means the change it describes is live on the site. Noted means we have read it and are not claiming a fix.

Ratings

19 reviews in total.

  • 5 stars9 reviews
  • 4 stars9 reviews
  • 3 stars0 reviews
  • 2 stars0 reviews
  • 1 star1 review

We show how many people gave each rating instead of an average. An average of reviews we chose to publish would say as much about that choice as about Cred Farmer.

All reviews

Newest first, by the date it was written.

Showing all 19 reviews.

The guide was on point and have cleared the claude associate developer exams wirh an excellent score of 912. I had just referred the notes from this website.
Verified learnerWritten
So far so good bro. For in-depth experience, I will need to clock in more time and find out. Thanks and all the best!
Verified learnerWritten
SO apparently Anthropic's training for their own certification is NOTHING like the actual test - that's where Cred Farmer comes in handy - it offers tests and training that are more like the ACTUAL exam, allowing you to study more efficently.
Verified learnerWritten
I found Cred Farmer incredibly useful in my preparation for the Claude Certified Associate - Foundations exam. It's easy to use, the study guides are clear, and it helped me understand the foundations properly rather than just memorise answers.
Verified learnerWritten
The mock exam are good, the final test are very similar.
Verified learnerWritten
Cred farmer is great. I have passed the claude developer and architect foundations courses with it. sometimes the answer is clear in the mock tests because the longest answer is frequently the correct one. also, i would distinguish between the module overviews and other, supplemental material. it wasn't always clear what was core to study and what might be extra
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Fixed

Thank you, and congratulations on passing both. You were right on both points, and both have changed. We rewrote the answer options in every mock exam in your account so the longest option no longer gives the answer away: on single-answer questions it is now the correct one about one time in four, as chance would have it. The Study Guide also labels every section Core, Practice, Reference or Not examined, and its reading path covers only the core and practice sections.

I hoped to do a few mock exams, which I could do and it helped a lo. Some of the questions were a bit difficult to understand, but overall the mock exams helped me a ton
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Noted

Thank you, we are really glad the mock exams helped you this much. We hear you that some questions were hard to understand. This release rewrote the answer options across every mock in your account and expanded the shortest explanations of why an answer is wrong, but we have not reviewed every question for clarity, so this stays open. Your answer review and drills now have a Report this question link, so if one trips you up you can tell us exactly which, and we will look at those first.

Excellent source for practice tests and learning. However it would really be good to have a pattern or a format to learn things in sequence. Otherwise it is a great attempt to learn things.
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Fixed

Thank you, we are glad the practice tests and study material are helping. You asked for a clear order, and the Study Guide now has one numbered path: getting started, then the core chapters for every examined domain, then the practice sections, each labelled Core or Practice, with each lesson linking to the next. Reference material such as the glossary and cheat sheets sits on the Resources tab, off the path. The 30-day plan was rewritten to follow the path and links to what it schedules.

I've been using it on and off to help drive out pre-test for Anthropic certifications. So far it's great, but I've not dug deep enough yet to give it a full 5 star review. That being said, the site seems easy to use, and intuitive.
Verified learnerWritten
I only used the mock exams. They ended up being slightly more contrived in prose compared to the real one but this is not inherently bad. One thing I would honestly handle better is checkpointing during the exam, right now any action (i.e. exiting the text, reloading the page, a session timeout) completely wipes all updates on the exam, needing a recompilation, which is kind of a nuisance.
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Fixed

Thank you, this report led directly to a fix, live since 23 September: in a mock taken while signed in, your answers save as you go and the practice list offers to resume the sitting. This release closes the gaps left. Signing in on another device, or two open tabs renewing your sign-in at once, no longer stops a mock from saving. Any answer not yet saved is kept on your device and saved when you come back, and every open sitting can be resumed, not only the newest. On the prose, that is fair: we write our questions without access to real exam items, so our wording will read differently.

The drills and mock tests are good - helped me in clearing the Claude developer exam
Verified learnerWritten
Add some videos to study by visualizing the concepts. Add some real world examples to understand the concepts more clearly.
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Noted

Thank you for both ideas. We still do not have videos. What has changed: every examined domain chapter in the study guides now has a diagram of its central idea, with a written description, and chapters link to the related diagrams in our blog articles. For real-world examples, each guide has Guided worked solutions and Hands-on labs, and the Associate Foundations labs were rewritten so each one starts from a realistic workplace scenario and points to a worked example in its chapter.

very well organised.
Verified learnerWritten
Most of the drills and mocks are effective. A small portion of questions are vague and lack a clear reasoning.
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Noted

Thank you, we are glad most of the drills and mocks are working for you. You were right that some needed work. This release expanded every note on why a wrong answer is wrong that was only a few words long, and rewrote notes that half agreed with a wrong answer. We cannot be sure that covers the questions you meant, so your answer review and drills now have a Report this question link. It tells us exactly which question felt vague, and we will look at those first.

The questions of mock exams significantly differed form the CCAF exam. The practice questions and exams appear to have been lifted from the Anthropic course questions, rather than using the questions from the actual exam as structural guidance.
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Noted

Thank you for comparing our mocks with the real exam. Exam questions are confidential and we have no access to them, so we write every question ourselves, and our closest model is Anthropic's official exam guide. You were right that our Architect Foundations mock exams did not follow it. Now every Architect Foundations form in your account presents four of the six scenarios the guide publishes, as the guide says the real exam does, with each scenario shown above its block of questions. We still cannot say how close our questions are to the real ones, so we are not calling this fixed.

Hi, is it possilbe to downlaod a prinitable version of this. It's too distracting to work when other tabs are open (and after a point even Chrome blockers dont work ) would be great if you have any workaround for this, thank you!

We removed the author's email address from this review.

Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Fixed

Thank you, this was a fair ask, and both parts now exist. The Study Guide page has a Print the whole guide button that lays out the guide in reading order with a contents page, so you can print it or save it as a PDF from your browser and study away from the screen. Each lesson also has a Focus button that hides the menus and chapter list and leaves only the lesson. It cannot close your other browser tabs, but it keeps our page quiet.

The mock exams and failed domains enforcement are great. the writing could improve maybe because its AI generate but something like "a calibrated effort setting, is a deliberation-depth decision:" feels too overblown, things that ai is guilty of doing but it impacts when you are reading pages and pages of overblown content.
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Fixed

Thank you, and we are glad the mock exams and the focus on failed domains work well for you. You were right about the writing. The sentence you quoted is now rewritten in plain words, and every section of all four study guides has had an editing pass: inflated phrases cut and long sentences split, with every fact and example kept. A check in our build now stops those phrases creeping back. If a page still reads that way to you, please tell us which one through Share feedback.

Truly amazing what you have created.. I am planning to take the assicaite exam in a week or two. Just wondering how close are the mock tests to the actual exam in terms of length and difficutly - it would be useful to know since I have heard contradictory things
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Noted

Thank you so much for the kind words. Our Associate mock exams match the official length: 60 multiple-choice and multiple-response questions in 120 minutes. Their difficulty is not calibrated against the real exam: we write every question ourselves with no access to real ones, so the sample questions in Anthropic's official exam guide are the best guide to it. New now: each form's intro shows its average first-sitting score once 20 learners have sat it in full, and when you record your result you can tell us whether the real exam felt harder, about the same or easier.

Mock tests are not marking some answered questions as completed and not allowing test submission and review.
Verified learnerWritten

Reply from Cred Farmer on Fixed

We're truly sorry, that must have been so frustrating. A bug in some of our practice tests stopped answers from saving and left some answered questions unmarked, so Submit and the review could not go through. We fixed both: answers save as you go, show as answered, and the test submits through to your answer review. One more change now: a multi-select question shows as answered once it has as many picks as it asks for. Until then it is marked partly answered, and the submit dialog lists it, because a partial answer is scored as wrong.